The Center for the Humanities sponsors and cosponsors lectures of interest to faculty and students across disciplines. Often associated with the Center's Interdisciplinary Research groups, these speakers introduce research projects and explore ideas that energize the intellectual climate of the university community.  Lectures are generally open to the public but as seating is often limited, registration may be required. 

Kadji Amin:

"Deidealization: A Heuristic for Politicized Fields of Study"

Monday, October 28, 2019; 5:00-6:15pm

Modern Languages and Literatures Conference Room (Merrick 210-01)


This talk seeks to bridge contemporary debates on affect and method occurring in literary studies, on the one hand, and in women’s, queer, and trans studies, on the other. It contends that the two-step between idealization and critique, not the dominance of critique, is the overriding methodological problem for politicized fields of study. Returning to Melanie Klein, Amin considers the potential harms of idealizing reparation – an influential method in queer studies and queer of color critique. In the present, the weight of scholarly idealization in women’s, queer, and trans studies falls on marginalized Black and brown bodies, placing particular burdens on scholars of color. Against the binary of idealization and critique, Amin proposes deidealization as a minor mode of the reparative that allows scholars to hold onto their political ideals while sympathetically recognizing how objects of study inevitably fall short of them.

This lecture is made possible by the Gender Studies Interdisciplinary Research Group, the Departmend of History, Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, the Department of English, and the Center for the Humanities.  


Kadji Amin is Director fo Graduate Studies and Assistant Professor of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Emory University.  Kadji Amin was previously an Assistant Professor of Queer Studies in the Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University, a Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow in “Sex” at the University of Pennsylvania Humanities Forum (2015-16) and a Faculty Fellow at the Humanities Institute at Stony Brook (2015). He earned his Ph.D. in Romance Studies (French) with a graduate Certificate in Feminist Studies from Duke University in 2009. His research, which focuses on the disorienting effects of the queer and transgender past on politicized fields of scholarship, is published or forthcoming in GLQ, Transgender Studies QuarterlyFeminist FormationsWomen’s Studies QuarterlyFrench Studies, Études françaises, and L’Esprit créateur. He is coeditor, with Amber Jamilla Musser and Roy Pérez, of a special issue of ASAP/Journal on “Queer Form” and is the “Books in Brief” editor for GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies.  

Shalini Puri:

"Fieldwork, Memory Studies, and the Public Humanities in the Anthropocene"

Thursday, January 30, 2020 at 3pm

Location TBA


Academic writing on both postcoloniality and the anthropocene often focuses on tragedy. The organizing vocabulary is often that of loss, death, stasis, crisis, catastrophe. Puri's concerns diverge from these, seeking out instead narratives that honor life and live joyously in the uncertain present. Taking the Grenada Revolution as a case-study, she approaches the postcolonial anthropocene less through spectacular moments of violence or success, tragedy or triumph, than through quieter, slower, and more enduring everyday processes that involve both individual and collective practices of remembrance.

Thinking through memorials, re-enactments, verbatim theater, landscape-as-setting, speculative and imaginative methods, Puri suggests ways that fieldwork informed by literary and performance studies can help reshape memory, action, and community. Drawing on theories of genre, affect, embodiment, social movements, and environmental justice, her central conceptual and methodological questions include: How might we strengthen the movement between Memory Studies and transformative action? How can fieldwork, suffused with the methods of the humanities, help? What silences continue to loom large and why? What are appropriate ways of approaching these silences? What forms of agency and collaboration does fieldwork in the humanities demand and enable?  And what forms of community, emotional sustenance, and joy does it offer? And finally, what might an eco-critical memory of the Grenada Revolution look like and accomplish?



Shalini Puri is Professor of English at the University of Pittsburgh.  She works on postcolonial theory and cultural studies of the global south with a focus on the Caribbean. Her research spans memory studies, feminism, marxism, nationalism, incarceration, the arts, everyday cultural practices, fieldwork, and activism. She continues top be interested in the cultural practices, conflicts, and solidarities that have arisen out of the African and Asian diasporas set in motion by slavery and indentureship.  Her 2014 book The Grenada Revolution In the Caribbean Present: Operation Urgent Memory grows out of an interest in an interdisciplinary humanities.  Her bookThe Caribbean Postcolonial: Social Equality, Post-Nationalism, and Cultural Hybridity won the Gordon and Sybil Lewis Award for best book in Caribbean Studies in 2005.  She co-edits the Palgrave Macmillan series "New Caribbean Studies," which features  interdisciplinary and humanities-informed scholarship.  Puri is a member of Pitt’s Race, Poetics, and Empire research group. As a founding member of the recently formed Pitt Prison Education Project, she teaches Literature courses in which University of Pittsburgh students and incarcerated students studied together at a state prison. Her work in progress is on the global politics and poetics of water.






Tania Lombrozo:

"Explanation: The Good, The Bad, and the Beautiful"

Tuesday, February 18, 2020; 3:30-5:00

Richter Library: Fexible Learning Space

Like scientists, children and adults are often motivated to explain the world around them, including why people behave in particular ways, why objects have some properties rather than others, and why events unfold as they do. Moreover, people have strong and systematic intuitions about what makes something a good (or beautiful) explanation. Why are we so driven to explain? And what accounts for our explanatory preferences? In this talk I’ll present evidence that both children and adults prefer explanations that are simple and have broad scope, consistent with many accounts of explanation from philosophy of science. The good news is that a preference for simple and broad explanations can sometimes improve learning and support effective inferences. The bad news is that under some conditions, these preferences can systematically lead children and adults astray.

This lecture is presented by the Cognitive Studies Interdisciplinary Research Group with support from the Department of Philosophy and the Center for the Humanities. 


lombrozo headshotTania Lombrozo is a Professor of Psychology at Princeton University, as well as an Associate of the Department of Philosophy. She received her Ph.D. in Psychology from Harvard University in 2006 after receiving a B.S. in Symbolic Systems and a B.A. in Philosophy from Stanford University. Dr. Lombrozo’s research aims to address foundational questions about cognition using the empirical tools of cognitive psychology and the conceptual tools of analytic philosophy. Her work focuses on explanation and understanding, social cognition, causal reasoning, and folk epistemology. She is the recipient of numerous early-career awards including the Stanton Prize from the Society for Philosophy and Psychology, the Spence Award from the Association for Psychological Science, a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation, and a James S. McDonnell Foundation Scholar Award in Understanding Human Cognition. She has blogged about psychology, philosophy, and cognitive science at Psychology Today and for NPR’s 13.7: Cosmos & Culture.


Suzanne Marchand:

"A Fragile Business: The Porcelain Industry in Eighteenth-Century Europe"

Wednesday, March 18, 2020; 4pm-6pm

Location TBA

porcelain manufacturingThis talk will treat porcelain-making--one of the great mercantile industries of the eighteenth century--not as a form of art but as a business, one which nicely illustrates the complexities of luxury production and consumption in the Holy Roman Empire's final decades.  Drawing on extensive archival research, it will pull back the curtain to describe the operation of porcelain manufactories and detail the means by which an increasingly affordable commodity was marketed, sold, and used.  The talk will conclude with a discussion of Central European porcelain's integration into the European luxury market by the 1770s.  This phenomenon made Meissen--the first European manufactory--a 'brand' but also exposed it and other German firms to competition generated by the new fashion leaders,  Sèvres and Wedgwood.
This lecture is presented by the Medieval and Early Modern Studies Interdisciplinary Research Group with support from the Department of History, the Lowe Art Museum, and the Center for the Humanities. 


Suzanne Marchand is Boyd Professor of History at Louisianna State University and holds an additional appointment in the Department of Comparative Literature.  Professor Marchand’s work focuses on European intellectual and cultural history, spanning the early modern and modern periods.  In addition ot her work on the history of the humanities, her largest current project focuses on the history of the porcelain industry in central Europe.  Professor Marchand is the author or editor of five books and dozens of chapters and articles, has received numerous prestigious fellowships and prizes, has served in professional leadership positions at the highest level, and is regarded by her peers as being in the highest echelon of historians.